1.5/5
The Dark Knight Rises has ambitions to rise, to soar, to climb above and
meet the lofty expectations that are unfairly shackled to it. Ultimately, though, it barely gets off
the ground, permanently restrained by the cement shoes of pretension, clumsy
storytelling, excessive length, and lack of focus, all the trademarks of its
creator, Christopher Nolan, the Internet appointed Awesomest Director Ever! Read the blogs, people: This guy makes
nothing short of a masterpiece every time he turns on a camera.
Oh,
brother. As someone that found Batman Begins plodding and underwhelming
and The Dark Knight overstuffed and
overrated, this final chapter in Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy doesn’t strike me
as the potential crowning jewel in the franchise that has everyone else and
their mothers drooling feverishly with fanboy rabidity. Instead, I inquisitively approach Nolan’s
work as a curious skeptic, on guard to one-day endorse him the title of Master
he so desperately craves. When he’s
worthy of it, I swear I’ll declare it, but until that day, Nolan remains, to
these eyes, a high-minded action-movie director with too much zeal and not
enough grace.
For starters, Nolan could have at least
made this Batman movie actually, you
know, about Batman—something its predecessor, The Dark Knight, failed to do. But such obvious dramatic foundation seems to slip the
director’s mind. The Dark Knight Rises is about juicier
stuff than superheroes. When your
movie tackles terrorism and economic dichotomies and moral conundrums and
numerous other topical and brainy subjects, what use are Bat-caves and
Bat-mobiles? At a ruthless 2 hours
and 45 minutes, the movie finds time for a dozen zeitgeist allusions—from the
financial crisis to Occupy Wall Street to the threat of new technologies. It fills its quota of flipping cars and
exploding bridges. It manages to
logjam in a whole slew of new extraneous characters. There’s plenty of room for plot turns and double
crosses. All the while, The Dark Knight Rises fails to properly
introduce, develop and resolve its protagonist, the guy with the pointy ears—the
one in the goddamn title.
Perhaps
I’m being unfair. Maybe the movie
does wrap up the tale of The Caped Crusader is the most facile sense, but I was
too distracted by Nolan’s Film-Noir-On-Speed stylistic disorder and his
debilitating need to overload his script with people, places, and flying things
to fully absorb—or care for—any pregnant insights on Bruce Wayne and his dark
alter ego. If they did exist, they
were, like so many of Nolan’s thematic “messages”, buried under three feet of
murky cinematic soot.
To
avoid ranting, let’s talk plot. It’s
been eight years since The Joker held Gotham City in a vice grip of fear, and turned
its golden boy, DA Harvey Dent, to the dark side. Remember, Batman took the rap for Dent’s deranged killing
spree and has gone underground to avoid the resulting lynch mob. His daytime other-half, Bruce Wayne
(Christian Bale), is now a gimpy Howard Hughes with a beard and Kleenex boxes
on his feet (so to speak). He no
longer makes public appearances.
The Dent Act—ratified after the eponymous man’s demise—has cleaned up
the streets, but left Gotham with a massive wage discrepancy. The middle class is shrinking.
In
marches a new villain, Bane. He
takes to the sewers with his army of Chechen Rebels, expatiating on revolution
to incite the masses against the wealthy, beginning with a strategic stock
market crash. A bald bodybuilder
with a black voice-box/muzzle that makes him sound like Darth Vader mixed with
an old English elocutionist, Bane is played by Tom Hardy, who gives an
impressive physical performance, but considering the disability of having to
act behind that awkward shroud, he comes off as little more than a meathead
with a funny voice. (They probably
could’ve cast Kane Hodder, the guy in the hockey mask from the Friday The 13th movies, and
few would know the difference.)
For
mostly incomprehensible reasons, at least until the finale’s (whoa!) giant twist, Bane takes control
of Gotham, sets up a people’s court presided over by the increasingly zany
Scarecrow, and keeps the outside world at bay with a massive nuclear
reactor/bomb. With the city in
dire peril yet again, Batman dusts off his suit and prepares to go head-to-head
with Gotham’s latest nihilistic overlord.
I
wish the story were that simple, I really do. But Nolan lives by this maxim: If it’s horribly convoluted,
people will mistake it for cooly complex.
Back are Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman), penitent over allowing
Batman to take Dent’s heat; superhero apparel handyman Lucius Fox (Morgan
Freeman); and trusty butler Alfred (Michael Caine), whose only role in this
smorgasbord is to cry every time he’s on screen. (Nolan has apparently taken
note that critics find his films emotionally vacuous, so as to indolently solve
that dilemma, he lets his English thespian turn on the waterworks malapropos.) There’s newcomer John Blake (Joseph
Gordon Levit), an idealistic rookie cop that does his own private sleuthing,
and leads around a ragtag troop of orphans like their scoutmaster; and billionaire
philanthropist Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard), Wayne’s newest business partner
and love interest.
All
these characters figure prominently into the monstrous narrative juggernaut
that is the plot of The Dark Knight Rises,
and throughout this loud and capricious grind you’ll feel as if you’re watching
three or four films at once, all crudely parallel edited into a single bloated
and busy picture without a semblance of intelligence or heart. But it’s about big, current, real-world
issues, you say? When asked which
way his film leaned on the political spectrum, Nolan replied with something
along the lines of, “I don’t know.
We just throw in as many things as we can to see what sticks.” In other words, his film has no voice
or point of view; it just name-drops hot button topics to fraudulently generate
relevance and respectability.
Bain’s
clearly the story’s resident “terrorist”, but his vendetta to avenge his old
master—Ra’s al Ghul (Liam Neeson from Batman
Begins)—hews closer to the motives of Die
Hard 3’s German bank robbers than any actual terrorist.
But
Nolan, employing his agonizingly urgent verbosity, makes the insinuation like a
broken record. Purported sophistication
isn’t the same as actual sophistication.
I’m reading too much into this, is that it? I’d happily proclaim the movie a mindless summer blockbuster
with some badass action scenes and
special effects, if it weren’t so heavily marinated in portent, pretension and big concepts. If it wants to be considered art, I’ll treat it as such. In that light, it’s worthless. As spectacle, sure Nolan knows how to
blow up a football field or demolish massive steal suspension bridges with the
help of his friends over in the Computer Generated Images department. If only he knew how to tell a clean,
coherent story and express fully formed ideas.
I
will concede that the one beacon of light in this overwhelming darkness has got
to be Anne Hathaway’s Selina Kyle.
A duplicitous cat burglar torn asunder by her allegiance to the 99% and
her obvious attraction to one mysterious billionaire, Kyle is even more slippery
than Batman, leaving him searching on rooftops as she evaporates stealthily
into the night. “So, that’s what
that feels like,” he growls. She
travels around with a cute little blonde teenager (maybe her ward, maybe her
lover?), and walks the ever-so-plausible tightrope between good and evil,
between solipsism and communal welfare.
In a less discursive film, Kyle could’ve really shined, but Hathaway
leaves her mark nonetheless, in a performance as witty and beguiling as it is
liberated and brilliantly unknowable.
That’s where the compliments end. The Dark Knight Rises, when it’s all said and done, really is a suitable capper to Christopher Nolan’s over-exalted trilogy. It manages to be as ponderous as Batman Begins and as overblown as The Dark Knight, while still being as empty as both, combined. So this is what “serious” superhero movies look like, huh? Hopefully now that Nolan’s take on the genre has at long last reached its conclusion, they can finally go back to being fun.
An excellent and thoughtful review. What really twisted my shorts was the transmogrification of the Dark Knight into a philanthropist in armor capable of forgiving even Catwoman's luring him to his near death. I suppose their eventual romantic exit to fantasy island symbolizes the Hegelian synthesis of the ultra-rich and the proletariat...
ReplyDelete